Devina Douglas, Attorney at Law (707) 408-3529
  • Home
  • Profile
  • Practice Areas
    • DUI
    • Assault Crimes
    • Theft Crimes
    • Domestic Violence
    • Drug Crimes
    • Sex Crimes
    • Homicide
    • Restraining Order-related >
      • Domestic Violence Restraining Orders
      • Other Types of Protective Orders
      • If You Are Served With A Protective Order
      • Resources for Victims of Domestic Violence
  • Contact
  • Results
  • Other information
    • Devina's Blog
    • Cal. Fish and Game Updates
    • Commonly-Requested Documents >
      • Local Ordinances
    • Reference Links
  • Disclaimer
  • SoCo and COVID

California abolishes money bail. Will it create new problems?

9/18/2018

 

Gov. Jerry Brown (D) signed a landmark bill (which will go into effect in October 2019,) into law in late August, which will make California the first state to abolish cash bail, instead giving judges discretion--which is supposed to focus on the person's risk to public safety--to decide which defendants should stay in jail pending trial, and which are lucky enough to get to go home, released on their own recognizance or under certain "pre-trial release" conditions.  Currently, bail is usually set according to a “bail schedule,” a standardized chart which directs a judge to set a certain bail in relation to the severity of the offense and the defendant’s previous criminal history. 

This is not a new issue, with the idea that cash bail is unfair going back at least 40 years, with Jerry Brown calling it at that time a "tax on poor people," and a recent court decision calling cash bail an unconstitutional denial of due process. The Federal court system's procedures for determining whether a defendant should be released helped to serve as a guide for California's system.  In the federal system defendants are often required to meet certain non-monetary conditions for pretrial release, which may include the surrender of a passport, electronic monitoring, participation in alcohol or drug treatment programs, or agreements to pay high fees if they fail to show up in order as ordered. 

The change in law came about because there were fears throughout the country that a system based on monetary bail is essentially criminalizing poverty, and needlessly filling the jails with defendants who have not yet been convicted of a crime. Under the new law defendants charged with certain low-level crimes would be released within 12 hours after booking without ever seeing a judge; everyone else would undergo a “risk assessment” that considers a multitude of factors. 

But, as always, this system isn't perfect, and late changes to the bill actually caused some previous supports to withdraw their support from the bill.  The greatest concern is that instead of leading to a greater number of people who will be released pending trial, the new system will lead to more people staying in custody, in large part because judges who face reelection may feel political pressure to keep more people in jail in the name of protecting public safety  until the defendant's lawyer can make an argument to the court in favor of release. “Unfortunately, this amended version of [Senate Bill 10] is not the model for pretrial justice and racial equity that the ACLU of California envisioned,” the ACLU of California’s three executive directors in northern and southern California and San Diego said in a joint statement. “We oppose the bill because it seeks to replace the current deeply-flawed system with an overly broad presumption of preventive detention.”
​

Not only is there fear the judges may cave to political pressure, there are critics of "risk assessment" protocols in general who claim that what truly amounts to an educated guess about a defendant's potential for future dangerousness may unfairly target racial minorities and the poor as it is common for these assessments to look to a defendant's family situation, income, and employment status.  


Comments are closed.

    Author

    Devina strives to make information relevant to the lives of her clients easily accessible. 

    Archives

    February 2023
    January 2023
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    January 2017

    Categories

    All
    DMV Related
    Domestic Violence
    Drugs
    DUI
    General Criminal Defense
    Gun Rights
    Marijuana Related
    Marijuana-Related
    SCOTUS News
    Weird News

    RSS Feed

Proudly serving Sonoma, Marin, Napa, Mendocino and Lake Counties (and occasionally venturing as far as Yolo, Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties).
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Proudly powered by Weebly

​This website is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Do not act or refrain from acting based on anything you read on this site. Using this site or communicating with the Law Office of Devina Douglas through this site does not form an attorney/client relationship. This site is legal advertising. Please review the full disclaimer for more information. (LINK TO FULL DISCLAIMER PAGE)
  • Home
  • Profile
  • Practice Areas
    • DUI
    • Assault Crimes
    • Theft Crimes
    • Domestic Violence
    • Drug Crimes
    • Sex Crimes
    • Homicide
    • Restraining Order-related >
      • Domestic Violence Restraining Orders
      • Other Types of Protective Orders
      • If You Are Served With A Protective Order
      • Resources for Victims of Domestic Violence
  • Contact
  • Results
  • Other information
    • Devina's Blog
    • Cal. Fish and Game Updates
    • Commonly-Requested Documents >
      • Local Ordinances
    • Reference Links
  • Disclaimer
  • SoCo and COVID