|
Withdrawing a criminal plea in California is a complex legal process governed primarily by California Penal Code § 1018. This law allows a defendant to ask the court to withdraw a guilty or no contest plea under specific conditions. The process is not automatic or guaranteed; instead, the defendant must demonstrate "good cause" for the request. This summary provides a comprehensive overview of the legal standards, procedures, timing, and potential outcomes of a motion to withdraw a plea in California criminal court.
Legal Basis for Withdrawing a Plea (Penal Code § 1018)Statutory FrameworkCalifornia Penal Code § 1018 states: "On application of the defendant at any time before judgment or within six months after an order granting probation is made (if entry of judgment is suspended), the court may, for good cause shown, permit the plea of guilty or nolo contendere to be withdrawn and a plea of not guilty substituted." Key elements from this statute include:
So What Constitutes “Good Cause”?California courts have interpreted “good cause” narrowly. It must be something more than mere regret, confusion, or a change of heart. Some commonly accepted grounds include: a. Involuntary Plea
Timing and Procedural Requirementsa. Before JudgmentThe easiest time to request withdrawal is before the court enters judgment (i.e., before sentencing). At this point, the defendant still retains the statutory right under § 1018 to request withdrawal for good cause. b. After Judgment — Limited TimeframeIf probation is granted and the entry of judgment is suspended, the defendant has six months to file the motion. After that window, the plea becomes final, and the defendant must pursue post-conviction remedies such as a petition for writ of habeas corpus or motion to vacate judgment under Penal Code § 1473.7 (especially relevant for immigration consequences). c. Filing the Motion
Common Scenarios Leading to Motions to Withdraw Pleasa. Immigration ConsequencesMany defendants are not advised that their plea could lead to deportation, exclusion from admission, or denial of naturalization. Under Padilla v. Kentucky (2010), failure to advise on immigration consequences may constitute ineffective assistance of counsel. For non-citizens, Penal Code § 1473.7 may offer an additional path to vacate a plea even after judgment has been entered, if the plea was not made knowingly or intelligently. b. Mental Health or Cognitive ImpairmentIf the defendant was suffering from a mental illness or cognitive impairment at the time of the plea, they may not have had the capacity to make a knowing and voluntary decision. c. Language BarrierIf the defendant did not fully understand the plea because of limited English proficiency and was not provided with adequate interpretation, this could support a withdrawal. d. Coercion or ThreatsClaims that the defendant was pressured into taking a plea by law enforcement or others may support withdrawal if documented. The Court’s DiscretionEven if the defendant shows good cause, the court has discretion to deny the motion. The judge will consider:
Consequences of Withdrawing a PleaWithdrawing a plea does not end the case—it simply returns it to the pre-plea stage. The prosecutor may:
Comparison with Federal LawFederal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(d) allows withdrawal of a guilty plea before sentencing if the defendant can show a fair and just reason. This is a broader standard than California’s “good cause.” However, after sentencing, withdrawal is allowed only to correct a manifest injustice—a much higher burden. California’s procedures and timeframes, while distinct, share similar goals: preserving fairness while respecting the finality of convictions. If you have a case in which you feel you need to withjdraw your plea, reach out to Devina Douglas to see if she's the right attorney to help! Comments are closed.
|
AuthorDevina strives to make information relevant to the lives of her clients easily accessible. Archives
November 2025
Categories
All
|
RSS Feed