Firearm Possesin Restrictions During Pretrial RElease

One frequent question I get from clients is "how can the judge tell me i can't own or possess firearms while my case is pending, before I've even been convicted of anything?" It can often feel unfair, but here's an overview:

California’s legal framework surrounding the prohibition of firearm possession during pretrial release is designed to balance public safety with the rights of individuals involved in criminal proceedings. This legal structure incorporates various laws, constitutional principles, and court rulings, with an emphasis on the need to protect victims, the community, and the integrity of the judicial process while ensuring that defendants' constitutional rights are not unduly infringd upon.

First, let's take a look at the concept of pretrail release: In California, pretrial release refers to the process of releasing a defendant from custody before their trial, often with conditions, such as following specific restrictions, in leiu of posting bail. The California Constitution and Penal Code both emphasize that bail should be granted unless there are concerns about public safety or the likelihood of a defendant fleeing. However, under certain circumstances, the court can impose conditions on a defendant’s release, including prohibiting firearm possession.

California Penal Code Sections 12021 and 12025 are foundational to the regulation of firearm possession. These sections generally prohibit the possession of firearms by individuals who have been convicted of certain felonies, have restraining orders against them, or have been adjudicated as mentally incompetent. However, the Penal Code also grants courts discretion in regulating the possession of firearms for individuals on pretrial release, particularly those accused of violent crimes or who pose a danger to public safety.

While a defendant is on pretrial release, the court may impose conditions deemed necessary to ensure the defendant’s appearance at trial and the safety of the public or victims. California Penal Code Section 1320.5 grants the court authority to impose such conditions, and in cases involving violent offenses or the potential risk of harm, this can include the prohibition of firearm possession.

For example, in the case of domestic violence or assault charges (cases in which we often see defendant's firearm rights restricted,) the court can issue an order preventing the defendant from possessing firearms as part of pretrial conditions. This is consistent with California Penal Code Section 527.6, which allows courts to issue restraining orders that include firearm prohibitions if there is a credible threat of harm.

Moreover, the California Legislature passed a law in 2019, Senate Bill 1200, which explicitly authorizes judges to prohibit defendants from possessing firearms during pretrial release in cases involving violent crimes, including domestic violence and certain types of assault.

Further, California’s domestic violence laws, particularly those under Penal Code Section 273.5, provide for enhanced firearm restrictions during pretrial release. When a defendant is charged with domestic violence-related offenses, including abuse or threats against a partner or spouse, courts are more likely to impose strict pretrial conditions, including the surrender of firearms. California’s law specifically empowers judges to prevent defendants accused of domestic violence from possessing firearms even before their trial. This is due to the recognized risk of escalation in domestic violence situations and the potential harm that firearms can pose in these contexts.

A defendant charged with domestic violence can be ordered to surrender their firearms to law enforcement or a designated third party, and failing to comply with such an order can result in additional criminal charges. This reflects California’s commitment to protecting victims from potential harm while a defendant is awaiting trial.

When determining whether a defendant on pretrial release should be prohibited from possessing firearms, the court considers several factors related to the individual’s behavior, criminal history, and potential risk to others. Courts have broad discretion under California Penal Code Section 1270 to set conditions of release based on risk assessments. For instance, a risk assessment might include an evaluation of whether the defendant has previously threatened violence, whether there is a history of weapon possession, or whether the defendant’s release might pose a threat to public safety. Based on these assessments, the court may impose a temporary prohibition on firearm possession until the trial concludes.

California’s firearm restrictions during pretrial release are also influenced by federal laws, particularly the Gun Control Act of 1968 and subsequent amendments, which prohibit individuals charged with certain federal offenses from possessing firearms. While California has its own set of regulations, these federal laws serve as a general framework for the regulation of firearms. California’s stricter standards, however, often go beyond federal law in protecting the public by imposing more frequent firearm prohibitions for individuals awaiting trial.

For example, the Lautenberg Amendment to the Gun Control Act prohibits individuals convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence crimes from possessing firearms. California has adopted similar, but often broader, standards, allowing judges to prohibit firearms as a condition of pretrial release in domestic violence and related cases even if no conviction has been obtained yet.

Defendants often want to challenge the firearm prohibition imposed during pretrial release, arguing that such restrictions infringe on their Second Amendment right to bear arms. However, the U.S. Supreme Court has held that constitutional rights are not absolute, and the government can restrict certain rights when there is a compelling state interest, such as public safety. In balancing these interests, California courts have found that public safety and the protection of potential victims often outweigh the temporary restriction on a defendant's right to possess firearms. For instance, in cases where the defendant is accused of violent crimes, including domestic violence or assault with a deadly weapon, courts will weigh the potential harm that could occur if firearms are not restricted. The court may also consider the fact that pretrial release is not a presumption of innocence, but rather a procedural step in a larger legal process.
​