CA felony sentencing

In California, felony sentencing is governed by complex laws that take into account various factors such as the nature of the crime, the defendant's criminal history, and specific sentencing guidelines. Here's a brief summary of how felony sentencing works in California:

California utilizes determinate and indeterminate sentencing depending on the nature of the offense and the defendant's criminal history:

• Determinate Sentencing: For most felonies, the court imposes a fixed term of imprisonment. The length of the sentence is determined by statute and can be increased or decreased based on aggravating or mitigating factors.
• Indeterminate Sentencing: Certain serious felonies, such as murder, may result in indeterminate sentences. This means the court imposes a range of possible sentences (such as 25 years to life) and a parole board determines the actual release date based on the inmate's conduct and rehabilitation efforts.

Sentencing Factors
Several factors influence the length and type of sentence imposed:

• Aggravating Factors: These include factors that increase the severity of the offense, such as the use of a weapon, prior criminal history, or the vulnerability of the victim. For example, if:
  • The crime involved great violence, great bodily harm, threat of great bodily harm, or other acts disclosing a high degree of cruelty, viciousness, or callousness;
  • The defendant was armed with or used a weapon at the time of the commission of the crime;
  • The victim was particularly vulnerable;
  • The defendant induced a minor to commit or assist in the commission of the crime;
  • The defendant threatened witnesses, unlawfully prevented or dissuaded witnesses from testifying, suborned perjury, or in any other way illegally interfered with the judicial process;
  • The defendant was convicted of other crimes for which consecutive sentences could have been imposed but for which concurrent sentences are being imposed;
  • The manner in which the crime was carried out indicates planning, sophistication, or professionalism;
  • The crime involved an attempted or actual taking or damage of great monetary value;
  • The crime involved a large quantity of contraband;
  • The defendant took advantage of a position of trust or confidence to commit the offense;
  • The crime constitutes a hate crime under section 422.55
  • The defendant induced others to participate in the commission of the crime or occupied a position of leadership or dominance of other participants in its commission;
  • The defendant has engaged in violent conduct that indicates a serious danger to society;
  • The defendant's prior convictions as an adult or sustained petitions in juvenile delinquency proceedings are numerous or of increasing seriousness;
  • The defendant has served a prior term in prison or county jail under section 1170(h);
  • The defendant was on probation, mandatory supervision, postrelease community supervision, or parole when the crime was committed;
  • The defendant's prior performance on probation, mandatory supervision, postrelease community supervision, or parole was unsatisfactory.
• Mitigating Factors: Conversely, mitigating factors can lead to a lesser sentence. These might include a lack of prior criminal record, remorse shown by the defendant, or circumstances suggesting the crime was not premeditated. For example, if
  • ​The defendant was a passive participant or played a minor role in the crime;
  • The victim was an initiator of, willing participant in, or aggressor or provoker of the incident;
  • The crime was committed because of an unusual circumstance, such as great provocation, that is unlikely to recur;
  • The defendant participated in the crime under circumstances of coercion or duress, or the criminal conduct was partially excusable for some other reason not amounting to a defense;
  • The defendant, with no apparent predisposition to do so, was induced by others to participate in the crime;
  • The defendant exercised caution to avoid harm to persons or damage to property, or the amounts of money or property taken were deliberately small, or no harm was done or threatened against the victim;
  • The defendant believed that he or she had a claim or right to the property taken, or for other reasons mistakenly believed that the conduct was legal;
  • The defendant was motivated by a desire to provide necessities for his or her family or self; 
  • The defendant suffered from repeated or continuous physical, sexual, or psychological abuse inflicted by the victim of the crime, and the victim of the crime, who inflicted the abuse, was the defendant's spouse, intimate cohabitant, or parent of the defendant's child; and the abuse does not amount to a defense;
  • If a firearm was used in the commission of the offense, it was unloaded or inoperable;
  • The defendant has no prior record, or has an insignificant record of criminal conduct, considering the recency and frequency of prior crimes;
  • The defendant was suffering from a mental or physical condition that significantly reduced culpability for the crime;
  • The defendant experienced psychological, physical, or childhood trauma, including, but not limited to, abuse, neglect, exploitation, or sexual violence and it was a factor in the commission of the crime;
  • The commission of the current offense is connected to the defendant's prior victimization or childhood trauma, or mental illness as defined by section 1385(c); 
  • The defendant is or was a victim of intimate partner violence or human trafficking at the time of the commission of the offense, and it was a factor in the commission of the offense;
  •  The defendant is under 26 years of age, or was under 26 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense;
  • The defendant was a juvenile when they committed the current offense;
  • The defendant voluntarily acknowledged wrongdoing before arrest or at an early stage of the criminal process;
  • The defendant is ineligible for probation and but for that ineligibility would have been granted probation;
  • Application of an enhancement could result in a sentence over 20 years;
  • Multiple enhancements are alleged in a single case;
  • Application of an enhancement could result in a discriminatory racial impact;
  • An enhancement is based on a prior conviction that is over five years old;
  • The defendant made restitution to the victim;
  • The defendant's prior performance on probation, mandatory supervision, postrelease community supervision, or parole was satisfactory.

Three Strikes
LawCalifornia's "Three Strikes" law mandates harsher sentences for individuals convicted of a felony who have previous serious or violent felony convictions. A third strike can result in a sentence of 25 years to life, even for non-violent felonies.

Probation and Alternative SentencingIn some cases, instead of prison time, the court may grant probation or alternative sentencing options like community service, drug rehabilitation programs, or electronic monitoring. These alternatives aim to rehabilitate the offender while reducing prison overcrowding.

Recent Reforms and Considerations
Based on various and numerous studies and report (example here) ecent legislative changes in California have focused on reducing mass incarceration and addressing disparities in sentencing. Efforts include reevaluating mandatory minimums and expanding eligibility for parole and early release programs.

Conclusion
California's felony sentencing laws are designed to balance punishment with rehabilitation and public safety considerations. The system incorporates both determinate and indeterminate sentencing based on the severity of the crime and the defendant's criminal history. While there is a focus on punitive measures, there are also provisions for probation and alternative sentencing aimed at reducing recidivism and integrating offenders back into society. As the legal landscape evolves, ongoing reforms seek to achieve a more equitable and effective approach to felony sentencing in the state.

If you need a lawyer, contact Devina here.