In California, theft is categorized into two main types: felony and misdemeanor, depending on the circumstances and the value of the property stolen. These distinctions are crucial as they determine the severity of potential consequences for individuals accused of theft.
Misdemeanor Theft:
Misdemeanor theft in California typically involves stealing property or services valued at $950 or less. This category encompasses a wide range of offenses, from shoplifting inexpensive items to minor instances of embezzlement or petty theft. Misdemeanor theft is generally considered less severe than felony theft and carries lighter penalties.
The penalties for misdemeanor theft in California can include fines, community service, probation, and in some cases, short-term incarceration. The exact consequences depend on factors such as prior criminal history and the specific circumstances of the theft.
For instance, under California law, petty theft (where the stolen property's value is $950 or less) is usually charged as a misdemeanor. If convicted, individuals may face a maximum fine of $1,000 and up to six months in county jail. However, many first-time offenders may receive lesser penalties, such as probation and community service, especially if they participate in theft prevention programs.
Felony Theft:
Felony theft occurs when the value of the stolen property or services exceeds $950 or if certain aggravating factors are present, regardless of the value. Felony theft is considered a more serious offense under California law and carries harsher penalties than misdemeanor theft.
The consequences for felony theft in California can include substantial fines, lengthy imprisonment in state prison (rather than county jail), restitution to the victim, and a permanent criminal record. The severity of the penalty is often determined by the value of the stolen property and the defendant's criminal history.
For example, grand theft is typically charged as a felony when the value of the stolen property exceeds $950. Penalties for grand theft can include imprisonment for up to three years, depending on the circumstances. Aggravating factors such as prior convictions or the use of violence can result in even harsher sentences.
Key Differences Between Felony and Misdemeanor Theft:

1. Value Threshold: The primary distinction between felony and misdemeanor theft in California is the value of the stolen property. Theft is generally considered a misdemeanor if the value is $950 or less and a felony if it exceeds $950.
   
2. Penalties: Misdemeanor theft carries lighter penalties than felony theft. While misdemeanors can result in fines, probation, and short-term incarceration, felony theft can lead to significant fines, longer prison sentences, and more severe repercussions.
   
3. Criminal Record: A conviction for either misdemeanor or felony theft results in a criminal record. However, felony convictions can have more profound and lasting consequences, affecting employment opportunities, housing options, and other aspects of life.
   
4. Prosecutorial Discretion: Prosecutors in California have discretion in determining whether to charge theft offenses as misdemeanors or felonies, based on the circumstances of the case and the defendant's criminal history.
   
5. Restitution: Both misdemeanor and felony theft convictions can require restitution to the victim. This involves reimbursing the victim for the value of the stolen property or services.
   

Legal Considerations:
It's important to note that California law provides avenues for defense against theft charges, regardless of whether they are classified as misdemeanors or felonies. Common defenses may include lack of intent to steal, mistaken identity, or consent from the property owner.
Moreover, California's criminal justice system recognizes the potential for rehabilitation and offers diversion programs for first-time offenders, particularly for misdemeanor offenses. These programs aim to educate offenders about the consequences of theft and reduce the likelihood of future criminal behavior.
In conclusion, understanding the difference between felony and misdemeanor theft in California is crucial for anyone accused of or facing charges related to theft. The distinction primarily hinges on the value of the stolen property and significantly impacts the severity of potential penalties. Whether the offense is charged as a misdemeanor or felony, seeking legal counsel and understanding one's rights are essential steps in navigating the criminal justice process effectively. To schedule a time to talk with Devina about a case you have, click here. 

Criminal domestic violence, often referred to as domestic abuse or intimate partner violence, is a serious offense under California law. It encompasses a range of abusive behaviors committed by one intimate partner against another, including physical violence, threats, emotional abuse, and stalking. These acts can have devastating effects on victims and their families, leading to physical injury, emotional trauma, and even death in extreme cases. Understanding how California defines, prosecutes, and addresses domestic violence is crucial for both victims and those involved in law enforcement and the legal system.
Defining Domestic Violence in California
In California, domestic violence is broadly defined under Penal Code section 13700 as abuse committed against an intimate partner or former partner. This includes spouses, cohabitants, individuals in dating relationships, parents of the same child, and others who have or had a close relationship with the defendant. The law recognizes that domestic violence can occur between individuals of any gender or sexual orientation.
Types of Domestic Violence
Domestic violence can take various forms, including:

1. Physical Abuse: Any bodily harm or injury inflicted on an intimate partner, such as hitting, punching, kicking, or using weapons.
   
2. Emotional Abuse: Non-physical behaviors that are intended to control, intimidate, or degrade the victim, including threats, insults, and manipulation.
   
3. Sexual Abuse: Coercing or forcing sexual acts against the victim's will, regardless of the relationship between the parties.
   
4. Financial Abuse: Controlling the victim's finances or resources to limit their independence or ability to leave the relationship.
   
5. Stalking: Repeatedly following, harassing, or threatening the victim, either in person or through electronic means.
   

Legal Remedies and Protections
California provides several legal protections for victims of domestic violence:

1. Emergency Protective Orders (EPOs): Issued by law enforcement officers at the scene of a domestic violence incident to provide immediate protection for the victim.
   
2. Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs): Court orders that prohibit the abuser from contacting or coming near the victim, their home, or workplace.
   
3. Permanent Restraining Orders: Long-term court orders that may be issued after a hearing, typically lasting up to five years but can be extended if necessary.
   

Criminal Penalties
The severity of criminal penalties for domestic violence in California depends on factors such as the seriousness of the offense, the defendant's criminal history, and whether the victim suffered significant injury. Penalties may include:

1. Misdemeanor Charges: For less severe cases, punishable by up to one year in county jail and fines.
   
2. Felony Charges: For more serious offenses or repeat offenses, punishable by imprisonment in state prison and higher fines.
   

Legal Process
The legal process for prosecuting domestic violence cases in California typically involves the following steps:

1. Arrest: Law enforcement officers may arrest the defendant if there is probable cause to believe domestic violence has occurred.
   
2. Arraignment: The defendant appears in court, is informed of the charges, and enters a plea of guilty or not guilty.
   
3. Pre-Trial Proceedings: Both parties may engage in discovery, where evidence is exchanged, and motions may be filed before the trial.
   
4. Trial: If the case proceeds to trial, both sides present evidence and witnesses, and the judge or jury determines guilt or innocence.
   
5. Sentencing: If convicted, the defendant is sentenced by the judge, taking into account the nature of the offense and any aggravating or mitigating factors.
   

Resources for Victims
California offers various resources and support services for victims of domestic violence, including:

1. Domestic Violence Shelters: Safe housing options for victims and their children seeking to escape abusive situations.
   
2. Counseling and Therapy: Mental health services to help victims cope with trauma and rebuild their lives.
   
3. Legal Assistance: Pro bono or low-cost legal services to help victims obtain restraining orders and navigate the legal system.
   

Challenges and Considerations
Despite legal protections and resources, addressing domestic violence remains complex and challenging. Many victims face barriers to seeking help, including fear of retaliation, financial dependence on the abuser, and cultural or societal pressures.
Conclusion
Criminal domestic violence is a significant issue in California, with far-reaching consequences for victims, families, and communities. By understanding the law, recognizing the signs of abuse, and supporting victims, individuals and communities can work together to prevent and address domestic violence effectively.

To obtain a search warrant, the police must adhere to specific procedures outlined in the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. Here's a comprehensive summary of what the police need to do to obtain a search warrant:

1. Establish Probable Cause: The cornerstone of obtaining a search warrant is establishing probable cause. This means there must be sufficient evidence for a reasonable person to believe that a crime has been committed or that evidence of a crime can be found at the location to be searched. Probable cause can be based on witness statements, informant tips, physical evidence, or police observations.
2. Draft an Affidavit: Once probable cause is established, a police officer or detective drafts an affidavit. This document outlines the facts and evidence supporting the belief that a search warrant is justified. The affidavit must be detailed and specific, providing enough information to convince a judge that there is probable cause. The officer swearing to the affidavit must attest to the truthfulness of the information provided. This oath emphasizes the seriousness of the warrant application process and underscores the legal and ethical obligation to present accurate information to the court.
3. Present to a Judge: With the affidavit in hand, the officer presents the warrant application to a judge or magistrate. This can be done over the phone or digitially. The judge reviews the affidavit to determine if probable cause exists. The judge may ask clarifying questions or request additional information before making a decision.
4. Issuance of the Warrant: If the judge finds probable cause based on the affidavit, they will issue a search warrant. The warrant specifies the location(s) to be searched and the items or evidence to be seized. It also authorizes law enforcement officers to conduct the search within a specified timeframe, usually within a few days of issuance.
5. Execution of the Search: Once issued, the search warrant allows law enforcement officers to enter the specified location and search for the specified items. They must execute the search warrant according to the terms outlined (such as time of day, method of entry, etc.) and ensure that they do not exceed the scope of the warrant.
6. Return of the Warrant: After completing the search, officers must provide an inventory of any items seized to the judge who issued the warrant. This ensures transparency and accountability in the execution of the warrant.
7. Exceptions and Limitations: There are exceptions to the warrant requirement, such as exigent circumstances where waiting for a warrant would endanger lives or risk evidence destruction. Additionally, some searches may be conducted without a warrant if the individual consents to the search or if evidence is in plain view during a lawful observation.
8. Legal Standards and Challenges: Any evidence seized during an unlawful search or seizure may be challenged in court. The legality of the search and the validity of the warrant may be scrutinized by defense attorneys to ensure that the Fourth Amendment rights of the accused were not violated.

In conclusion, obtaining a search warrant is a rigorous process designed to protect individuals' rights while allowing law enforcement to gather evidence legally. It requires careful adherence to legal standards, thorough documentation of probable cause, and judicial oversight to ensure the validity and legality of the search and seizure process.

If you'd like to speak with Devina about your case, her contact information can be found here. 
.